Skip to content

Dirac delta function VS Kronecker delta function


In one word, Dirac delta function is for continuous cases, but Kronecker delta is for discrete cases.

Dirac and Kronecker delta functions are useful in random presses. We can always find them in papers and books especially when white noise appears. They usually are both denoted as \delta(*). They are the same? No!!!

  1. Dirac delta function:
    \delta(t)=+\infty if t=0

    \delta(t)=0        if t\ne 0

    Moreover, don’t forget the constraint: \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta (\tau) d\tau=1.
  2. Kronecker delta function:
    \delta(k)=1 if k=0

    \delta(k)=0 if k\ne 0, (k=\pm 1, \pm 2,...)

The most famous property

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta (\tau-x) f(\tau)d\tau=f(x)

is for Dirac delta function! That’s because integrals require continuous function, while Kronecker delta function is a discrete one. In fact, similarly we have

\sum_{i=-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta (i-k) f(i)=f(k)

Now you may understand why Kronecker delta function will have \delta(k)=1 but not infinity when k=0.

Moreover, for white noise w(t),


here is Dirac delta function.

For white sequence w(k),


here is Kronecker delta function. Note for discrete cases, we can also find $\latex w(t), w(t+1)$, remember it is discrete.

One Comment leave one →
  1. 13/08/2014 9:22 am

    Hey! This was a very interesting reading. I hope you don’t mind I used your article to explain this concept in a presentation for a couse in my university. Thanks a lot!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: